AI, CONTRACTS, AND BUSINESS DISPUTES: NEW LEGAL RISKS BUSINESS OWNERS SHOULD UNDERSTAND
Providing Legal Services with Integrity and Excellence
Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing how businesses operate, from drafting contracts to managing customer information and making financial decisions. While these tools can save time and money, they also introduce legal risks involving contractual obligations, data privacy, intellectual property, and business disputes that many owners may not fully anticipate.
Technology may change how business gets done, but it does not eliminate legal responsibilities. A poorly reviewed contract or an overlooked AI-generated error can still result in costly disagreements, financial losses, and litigation.
AI can produce business proposals, contracts, reports, and other documents within seconds. The problem? Its answers are not always accurate.
Suppose a company uses AI to prepare a client proposal containing incorrect pricing, misleading product information, or unrealistic delivery commitments. If those statements become part of an agreement, the company could face a contract dispute or other legal claims. Depending on the circumstances, inaccurate statements may also raise concerns involving fraud, misrepresentation, or consumer protection laws.
Business owners should remember that using AI does not automatically excuse them from responsibility for inaccurate information. Important documents and business decisions still require careful human review.
Employees may use AI tools without considering what happens to the information they enter. Customer records, financial reports, internal strategies, and confidential agreements could be exposed to third-party systems. This presents particular concerns for businesses that rely on proprietary information to maintain their competitive advantage.
Under the Virginia Uniform Trade Secrets Act, qualifying confidential business information receives legal protection when reasonable measures are taken to preserve its secrecy. Allowing employees to enter sensitive information into AI systems without proper safeguards could undermine those efforts.
Businesses should establish clear policies regarding AI use, restrict access to confidential records, and review their nondisclosure agreements to address unauthorized disclosures.
A business contract should clearly establish each party’s responsibilities. However, agreements written before AI became widely used may not adequately address its role in delivering products or services.
For example, consider hiring a vendor that uses AI to process customer data or generate deliverables. Who is responsible if the technology produces inaccurate results, exposes confidential information, or fails to meet agreed standards? Without clear contract provisions, both parties may interpret their obligations differently.
Business owners should review agreements for provisions covering AI use and disclosure, data protection, liability and indemnification, intellectual property rights, and dispute resolution. These provisions can help reduce uncertainty and establish accountability before problems arise.
Who owns a marketing campaign, design, or written material created using artificial intelligence? The answer may be less straightforward than businesses expect.
According to the U.S. Copyright Office, AI-generated material generally requires sufficient human creative authorship to qualify for copyright protection. Simply providing prompts does not necessarily establish copyright ownership.
This creates concerns for businesses paying contractors or agencies to produce content using generative AI. A company could pay for a deliverable only to discover that certain elements lack the copyright protection it anticipated. Contracts should therefore address AI-generated materials, human creative contributions, ownership rights, and the permitted use of third-party content.
Automated customer communications, AI-assisted negotiations, and machine-generated documents may create confusion over representations, approvals, or contractual terms. When disagreements arise, businesses may need to preserve electronic records, document revisions, communications, and relevant AI-generated materials to establish what occurred.
Traditional legal claims involving breach of contract, fraud, misrepresentation, or disclosure of trade secrets may still apply, even when AI played a role. The important point is that AI does not replace accountability in business relationships. Owners must remain attentive to how technology influences their agreements, employees, and commercial transactions.
AI offers valuable opportunities, but businesses should not overlook the legal responsibilities that accompany its use. Reviewing contracts, protecting confidential information, and establishing clear business practices can help prevent minor oversights from becoming expensive disputes.
When disagreements occur, obtaining timely legal advice may also provide opportunities to resolve matters through negotiation, mediation, or litigation when necessary. Stephen H. Ratliff assists businesses with contractual matters, commercial disputes, and civil litigation in Fairfax, Virginia, and surrounding areas. Whether you need assistance reviewing an agreement or addressing a developing business dispute, understanding your legal position is an important first step.
Call 703-691-3330 to discuss your concerns with a business and contract attorney.

703-691-3330
10511 Judicial Drive, Suite 111
Fairfax, VA 22030-5114
703-691-3175